Go vs C¶
Both the Go and C# implementations expose identical MCP tools with identical behavior and response formats. Pick based on your preferences.
Comparison¶
| Aspect | Go | C# Native AOT |
|---|---|---|
| Binary size | ~10--15 MB | ~25--40 MB |
| Startup time | ~10--50ms | ~50--100ms |
| Runtime dependency | None | None |
| Language | Go 1.26 | C# / .NET 10 |
| MCP SDK | Official modelcontextprotocol/go-sdk |
Official ModelContextProtocol (.NET) |
| Auth implementation | golang.org/x/oauth2/google |
Native RSA + HttpClient |
| AOT compiled | Yes | Yes (Native AOT) |
Both binaries are fully self-contained. No Go toolchain, .NET runtime, Node.js, or Python is needed to run them.
Recommendation¶
Both work great. Pick Go for a smaller binary size. Pick C# if you're more comfortable with the .NET ecosystem or want to inspect/modify the source.
Naming Convention¶
Binary names follow this pattern:
Examples:
gsc-mcp-go-linux-amd64-- Go, Linux x64gsc-mcp-csharp-win-x64.exe-- C#, Windows x64gsc-mcp-go-darwin-arm64-- Go, macOS Apple Silicon
See the Getting Started page for the full download table.
Tool Parity¶
If a feature is added to one implementation, it's added to both. The Go and C# versions are kept in sync. If you discover a behavioral difference between the two, please open an issue.